3 ms·
I mean...ok, I guess if you allow committing directly to master, and you allow merging in both directions...sure, I see your point. In our repos, we allow neit
by ilikepi 7y ago
I mean...ok, I guess if you allow committing directly to master, and you allow merging in both directions...sure, I see your point.
In our repos, we allow neither, so all non-merge commits are, by definition, on a feature branch on the right-hand-side.
I guess one person's hacky convention is another's primary workflow. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- doubleunplussed 7y agoDoes this mean you can't have merge commits in feature branches? And what about maintaining a release branch? There are good reasons to be merging in both directions sometimes, even if you never commit directly to master.