There is nothing wrong with defending valid science against discredited, unsubstantiated, repeatedly debunked crap. Accepting their points as valid and not dis

There is nothing wrong with defending valid science against discredited, unsubstantiated, repeatedly debunked crap. Accepting their points as valid and not disputing them just leads to the perception there are two equally valid opinions about the topic, when one of them is fringe and makes bad arguments. We do ourselves no favors by that sort of attitude being common and accepted.