2 ms·
That's something I don't get... I believe there's an audience for "hand" form factor. Yet, companies make bigger phones and consider small phone audience as tho
by rock_artist 7y ago
That's something I don't get...
I believe there's an audience for "hand" form factor.
Yet, companies make bigger phones and consider small phone audience as those who would pay less and get less.
Why on earth they can't understand some people would actually pay for top notch hardware in smaller hardware?
Why plus/+/XL or whatever they name it usually gets beefier CPU/RAM/Storage? It's not like ultraportable laptops vs 15" ones. there are no real thermal limitations.
- Someone 7y agoI think the limitation is volume. Scale a phone by 10% in all directions, and its volume goes up by 33% (-ish). Its display grows by only 21% in area, though. So, roughly, you get 10% more power per pixel or square inch of screen. And I think it’s even worse for the smaller phone. The faster CPU and GPU and more memory you need to drive 21% more pixels and to light 21% more screen area do not take up 33% more volume, and Bluetooth and cellular radios stay the same size, so you can scale the battery volume by over 33%, and, likely, its capacity even more, as the fraction of the battery’s volume that is lost to the battery housing can be lower for larger batteries. Scale a phone by 30% in all dimensions, and the effect is a lot larger; 69% more screen area, but 120% more volume, so almost double the power/pixel.
- phyrex 7y agoThe screen is the component that uses up the most energy though. By having a smaller screen, you can get by with a smaller battery.