I get that the fees can't be comparable, but without passive management, active management fees are unchecked, and they rose a lot over time. I'm willing to ag

I get that the fees can't be comparable, but without passive management, active management fees are unchecked, and they rose a lot over time. I'm willing to agree that it should cost an order of magnitude more for an actively managed fee, but most are beyond that. A lot of this seems like plain greed to me, combined with grift and graft. A lot of workplace plans try to funnel people into actively managed funds that often charge really high fees.