3 ms·
Did you mean to reply to my post? I don't see the relevance.
by whatok 7y ago
Did you mean to reply to my post? I don't see the relevance.
- whatshisface 7y agoAn index passively holding 99% of the market would not interfere with price discovery because the remaining 1% would go about its business as if nothing was different. Indexes can't sustain irrational prices because they have no impact on prices.
- whatok 7y agoA single entity holding 99% of anything will absolutely have an impact on liquidity which absolutely impacts price discovery.
- usefulcat 7y ago> An index passively holding 99% of the market would not interfere with price discovery because the remaining 1% would go about its business as if nothing was different. That may be true at the point in time where it's already at 99%, but consider the impact on prices as funds were poured into it over time on the way to 99%..
- whatshisface 7y agoIf the funds put in to the index were taken out of mutual funds, there might not be any impact on the prices at all.