4 ms·
The entire article just reads like hand-waving with no real substance. > UBI advocates would argue that non-universal transfer programs are less attractive bec
by viklove 7y ago
The entire article just reads like hand-waving with no real substance.
> UBI advocates would argue that non-universal transfer programs are less attractive because voters will not embrace them as enthusiastically. But this criticism is unfounded.
Why is it unfounded? Am I just supposed to take that on faith? The author probably should've written more than 2 sentences after this statement before moving onto his next assertion.