4 ms·
Sure. The important difference between us is I believe guns start and end as consumer goods. All of the other things they serve are better handled through inst
by kristopolous 7y ago
Sure. The important difference between us is I believe guns start and end as consumer goods.
All of the other things they serve are better handled through institutions and organizing.
The combinations of the two, organizations with guns, that becomes a much more plausible threat to peace and liberty because it affords an opportunity to exploit a power dynamic which could lead to tyranny.
Yielding to the wisdom of crowds with weapons mean that fear and threat become larger tools of society building than reflection, collaboration, listening, and creativity.
- jakeogh 7y agoSo ask the attacker to please pause 5+ min while you wait for the police? No, you want individuals to own effective weapons. Right? It seems like you are pro-gun ownership, I'm not sure what your point is. If you survey history, bad things are often preceeded by a segment of the population being disarmed.