I personally think you're reaching. You might as well point out that a Supercar doesn't take pictures. I mean, really, are we going to get into discussing the

I personally think you're reaching. You might as well point out that a Supercar doesn't take pictures. I mean, really, are we going to get into discussing the people who buy a supercar and hold it as an investment/collectible and rarely drive it? Or what about the people who track their McLaren and absolutely use it to its full potential? Those people 100% absolutely drive them for performance and use every bit of it. And yes, there are camera owners who collect cameras. And camera owners who buy "Prosumer" models just because they want a nice camera, even if they don't use it to its full potential. Maybe not you, but we both know there are such people. That doesn't really invalidate my analogy or validate it. If you feel around to the edges of any metaphor, it breaks. But the question is whether the basic idea is right. I think it's right enough, you don't. Ok.