4 ms·
You can't disagree with either cperciva or btilly, because they've merely been presenting facts and figures. I don't see an opinion there
by Confusion 16y ago
You can't disagree with either cperciva or btilly, because they've merely been presenting facts and figures. I don't see an opinion there
- gjm11 16y agoThe original article said: Is there too much inequality in the world? Sure. And cperciva reiterated that opinion above. That's what drunkpotato is disagreeing with. It is clearly an opinion that isn't purely a matter of facts and figures. (One with which, as I happen, I agree.)
- Confusion 16y agoI don't think drunkpotato is disagreeing with that at all. He's supporting someone that states that wealth disparity is not a good thing.
- gjm11 16y agoWhoops, yes, I got that backwards. Anyway, the point is that what he's agreeing and disagreeing with are opinions that aren't just a matter of unambiguous facts and figures.
- Confusion 16y agoI don't think that opinion of cperciva is relevant to the point btilly made, which is the subject of this subdiscussion. As such, there are no opinions to disagree with. I may be imagining things, but I've seen too many cases of people discarding facts because of some not directly relevant opinion the author/collector/presentor of the facts also happens to have.
- drunkpotato 16y agoI was acknowledging that not everyone agrees that wealth disparity is necessary. I did not state my opinion on the matter, merely that it is difficult to see how it could be avoided should we want to. I was trying to point out that a glib "Nope" doesn't bring anything new to the table. Moving on to my personal opinion, I think it's more productive to think in terms of how much wealth disparity is part of a reasonably robust and functioning economy. We've all seen the numbers that show a steady trend upwards over the last 3 decades. That does not seem to be a good thing.