4 ms·

> Let's dispense with the emotional imputation, then. Yes, let's. You're the one pretending to read minds and attribute emotion. Stick to facts, bub. Here's a

> Let's dispense with the emotional imputation, then. Yes, let's. You're the one pretending to read minds and attribute emotion. Stick to facts, bub. Here's another hint: just because someone's not talking about the global poor doesn't mean they don't care. That's just not the conversation they're trying to have right now. The current topic is inequality in US college admissions. Insisting that people talk about something else is just concern trolling. It's deflection from the fact that those admissions claim to be meritocratic but clearly aren't, thus a defense of both inequity and misrepresentation. Why are you so soft on things that disgust others?

darawk 7y ago
> Yes, let's. You're the one pretending to read minds and attribute emotion. Stick to facts, bub. Like I said, feel free to insert any other emotion that explains the facts. > Here's another hint: just because someone's not talking about the global poor doesn't mean they don't care. That's just not the conversation they're trying to have right now. The current topic is inequality in US college admissions. Which current topic? Did you read the comment I was originally responding to? It was making statements much broader than college admissions.