Then I would call them money concentration machines, with "tech" just being a new-ish fig leaf for something that's not new at all: > [Hobbes'] Leviathan was n

Then I would call them money concentration machines, with "tech" just being a new-ish fig leaf for something that's not new at all: > [Hobbes'] Leviathan was not concerned with idle speculation about new political principles or the old search for reason as it governs the community of men; it was strictly a "reckoning of the consequences" that follow from the rise of a new class in society whose existence is essentially tied up with property as a dynamic, new property-producing device. The so-called accumulation of capital which gave birth to the bourgeoisie changed the very conception of property and wealth: they were no longer considered to be the results of accumulation and acquisition but their beginnings; wealth became a never-ending process of getting wealthier. The classification of the bourgeoisie as an owning class is only superficially correct, for a characteristic of this class has been that everybody could belong to it who conceived of life as a process of perpetually becoming wealthier, and considered money as something sacrosanct which under no circumstances should be a mere commodity for consumption. -- Hannah Arendt, "Origins of Totalitarianism"