3 ms·
You were arguing from an absolute, government should stay out, free markets. If disbanding the FCC is silly, then the absolute doesn't hold. That means we sho
by jbooth 16y ago
You were arguing from an absolute, government should stay out, free markets.
If disbanding the FCC is silly, then the absolute doesn't hold. That means we should evaluate on a case by case basis -- free markets are of course a good default position to deviate from depending on the exception, of course.
1929-1932 was most noteworthy for Hoover not trying a whole lot of new approaches. Then this FDR guy started, his whole thing was called "New Deal".
- protomyth 16y ago"You were arguing from an absolute, government should stay out, free markets." What?!? Where the heck does the "consistent set of rules" come from other than government? I have no real clue where your response comes from. As to you second 'point', look at the government changes and how long it took for business to recover.