I was interested in why it was rejected, the answer was funnier than expected: The invention is not supported by a credible utility or well established utility

I was interested in why it was rejected, the answer was funnier than expected: The invention is not supported by a credible utility or well established utility because the claims call for the generation of gravitational waves and the interacting of the waves with hyperspace and the effects which are asserted to come from such interactions. The existence of hyperspace is not well proven or shown to exist in accordance with credible science and physics. The use of hyperspace and gravitation waves in the claims therefore must be backed up with significant scientific experimental data to firstly prove that hyperspace interacting with gravitation waves produces some effect and secondly that the applicant has the ability to harness such interaction for a useful purpose and can demonstrate such on demand. Also the existence of wormholes and the generating of wormholes is in question currently in the scientific community and as such these claims must be backed with proof through scientific data and description [...] The examiner maintains that the present invention does not conform to known scientific principles [...] etc. etc. edit to add the source: https://globaldossier.uspto.gov/#/details/US/10953212/A/87539 https://globaldossier.uspto.gov/#/details/US/10953212/A/8753... (click on "non-final rejection")