First use of "exponential growth" in the article was OK. I don't think the second use was. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20866372 https://news.ycombi

First use of "exponential growth" in the article was OK. I don't think the second use was. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20866372 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20866372