We know that having a fairly constant source of baseline power works because that is what we are currently doing. The onus to prove that some combination of win

We know that having a fairly constant source of baseline power works because that is what we are currently doing. The onus to prove that some combination of wind solar and batteries costs less and will deliver sufficient power across all use cases should be on the wind / solar advocates. We know nuclear plants work because they're currently in use all over the world. Why demand numbers from others when you can't provide any yourself?