Video evidence has always required testimony to its provenance, hasn't it? Otherwise it can be removed as hearsay. Courts have always been worried about authent

Video evidence has always required testimony to its provenance, hasn't it? Otherwise it can be removed as hearsay. Courts have always been worried about authenticating evidence including video. https://jamespublishing.com/2013/objecting-video-audio-evidence-without-hesitation/ https://jamespublishing.com/2013/objecting-video-audio-evide... https://www.esquiresolutions.com/federal-rules-catch-digital-evidence-avalanche/ https://www.esquiresolutions.com/federal-rules-catch-digital...