> This means languages which emphasize security, at the cost of ease of use, are at a disadvantage. Why make such languages in the first place? Especially cons

> This means languages which emphasize security, at the cost of ease of use, are at a disadvantage. Why make such languages in the first place? Especially considering that you don't need to, user experience is not in conflict with emphasizing security. Suggesting rewrites is also a non-solution, given that you can make C much safer without rewrites. The problem here is rather different: you just want people to use Rust, not actually solve any of the raised issues.