2 ms·
Assuming you genuinely are trying to make a good faith argument (which I strongly feel you're not): Pandas eat bamboo. Bamboo has practically no nutritional va
by kchamplewski 7y ago
Assuming you genuinely are trying to make a good faith argument (which I strongly feel you're not):
Pandas eat bamboo. Bamboo has practically no nutritional value so, no, Pandas are not very energetic.
None of the vegetarians I know need 16 hours of sleep per day, and I suspect that's because
- They are not bears, and so do not have the metabolism of bears.
- They don't subsist entirely off bamboo, or one foodstuff in general.
Besides, the a primarily vegetarian diet doesn't necessarily mean no meat, it just means realising that meat production is so absurdly energy, land, and water intensive that eating it on a daily basis is simply unsustainable.
The amount of energy that goes into cooking hour meat is negligible compared to the amount of energy needed to produce it in the first place.
- lostjohnny 7y ago> Besides, the a primarily vegetarian diet doesn't necessarily mean no meat Just eat less. If you eat less, you automatically balance your diet. You could live of three pieces of beef junkie a day for a long time, that's not so bad for environment as well. They made you believe that "meat production is so absurdly energy, land, and water intensive" but that's because our information system is mainly based on the US lifestyle, the land of freedom (to destroy other people lives). I grew up in places like this, where meat production is almost a natural process. https://reportagedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2018/11/pascolo-brado-sul-sirente-dopo-la-demonticazione-foto-maria-trozzi-report-age-com-12-11-1.jpg?w=1200 https://reportagedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2018/11/pascolo-... The more you eat, the more the spectrum moves towards junk food. Beyond true hunger, it's only addiction. Addictions are never a good thing.