3 ms·
What's interesting is that there's already a similar internationally agreed framework for how to approach this - shipping - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intern
by DreamSpinner 7y ago
What's interesting is that there's already a similar internationally agreed framework for how to approach this - shipping - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Regulations_for_Preventing_Collisions_at_Sea https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Regulations_for_... - These would probably be a good place to start considering a framework for satellite orbit adjustments. However, despite this framework, it still happens - and I can see the issue of risk evaluation being a big one - what if one entity thinks a 1/1000 risk is acceptable for their cheap satellite vs the other satellite wanting 1/1000000?
- pmyteh 7y agoYou're liable for damage to the other party if you're at fault for a maritime collision, so there's at least some countervailing economic pressure against taking the risk. Your insurers will not be happy with you if you negligently sink someone else's oil tanker.
- frankharv 7y agoI agree with this. Rules of the seas are not laws but more like a code for mariners to follow. Too bad we see such ignorance in space. Think of the ESA bird as a "boat in anchor". Lit up with the proper anchorage lights. Now some jackass with a jetski is blasting right twords you.