5 ms·
Having recently lost an aunt to cancer, statements like this in medical literature, disappoint: "However, chronic caloric restriction is not a feasible clinica
by ijidak 7y ago
Having recently lost an aunt to cancer, statements like this in medical literature, disappoint:
"However, chronic caloric restriction is not a feasible clinical intervention. Evident difficulties, such as the long period required to be effective, and unacceptable weight loss [10, 11], hamper clinical application in cancer patients."
Doctors will fail to offer fasting as a partial solution because it's assumed that patients will reject this option.
It would be great for fasting to be presented to the patient as a partial solution.
Many would absolutely fast to help survival chances.
Generally the lay advice to one who is sick is: "eat, so you can maintain your strength".
When in fact, the rule of thumb, "eat to maintain your strength" isn't always true.
Sometimes, NOT eating is better for certain diseases, such as cancer.
But few doctors will ever explain this because statements like the above cause doctors to conclude, "telling the patient to fast is not practical.."
- wtallis 7y agoI think you're inaccurately conflating "chronic caloric restriction" with any and all forms of fasting, when it refers only to rather severe long-term fasting/starvation of the sort that has been tested in mice but is borderline unethical to test on humans even if they aren't being ravaged by cancer and chemotherapy. That's why short-term fasting is worth investigating.
- jcims 7y agoMy experience with a family member being treated for cancer is that the medical community basically ignores diet unless it's creating acute mechanical problems like a bowel obstruction. I don't think most of the providers we are working with have received any relevant training. It's pretty frustrating.