3 ms·
Valid point, although a few considerations: 1. generally speaking, kernel version increases don't translate to performance improvements (example: https://www.p
by pizza234 7y ago
Valid point, although a few considerations:
1. generally speaking, kernel version increases don't translate to performance improvements (example: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux-50-sliding&num=1 https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux-50...)
2. the Dell 840 are latest generation servers (https://www.dell.com/en-us/work/shop/poweredge-rack-servers/sf/poweredge-rack-servers https://www.dell.com/en-us/work/shop/poweredge-rack-servers/...), so I doubt that they're not optimized to be competitive with latest operating systems). after all, this is a real-world machine one buys, so it's supposed to be highly performing.
All in all, the performance improvement seems to be proportional to the single thread performance improvement (however small) componded by the higher core count.
However of course, it can't be excluded that the difference is at least partially caused by the different setup.
- weare138 7y agoThe benchmark you linked to somewhat misses the point I'm trying to make. It's specifically comparing the 4.0 branch (4.12-4.20) to 5.0 on the same distribution. The distribution is also a factor in performence. Check out this benchmark comparing CentOS 7 to other distributions on the same hardware: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=5distros-post-spectre&num=2 https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=5distros... CentOS 7 is slower in most of the tests compared to a recent version of Ubuntu (17.10 was used in this comparison), which itself is slower than Clear Linux in most tests.
- martinpw 7y agoI had no idea the performance differences between the distros was so significant. Which settings/compiler flags have the largest effect here?