'would need to' lol. What about pragmatic discussions in domains where clear data isn't accessible? Deriving high probability conclusions from high probabilit

'would need to' lol. What about pragmatic discussions in domains where clear data isn't accessible? Deriving high probability conclusions from high probability premises? >A greater number of people took psychedelics because they're more accessible due to anonymous, location independent markets Likelihood of this not being true approaches zero IMO. > Psychedelics change people's lives meaningfully Sufficient research exists to back this up. Michael Pollan's book cites many. > the kind of people who buy drugs on the internet are the kind that are demographically likely to experience positive life changes from psychedelics. You may want to note: most would agree by volume, those buying psychs online are also distribute them with their social sphere. The dark net facilitates local area networks of psych access. There's no a 1st order relationship here.