>The contract is with the hiring company. Once I’ve submitted your resume to a company, with your permission, the company can’t hire you without paying me. So a

>The contract is with the hiring company. Once I’ve submitted your resume to a company, with your permission, the company can’t hire you without paying me. So as long as I have your permission to put you forward for a role, and submit you to the client, you can cut me out of the process as much as you wish ... I’m still getting paid if you take the role. But isn't it the same for Wag? The point is that you have two counterparts: 1) the company that could deny having actually employed your candidate but that cannot because there are records about the hiring 2) the candidate that (since he/she has nothing to loose) has no reason to deny being hired What have Wag to actually prove that someone got again the same dog walker and that they met for the first time through Wag?