4 ms·
Und? If republican politicians talk nazi shit why should their speech be protected because they are republican politicians? If one group their speech should be
by Yaa101 7y ago
Und? If republican politicians talk nazi shit why should their speech be protected because they are republican politicians?
If one group their speech should be put under a enlarging glass then it's politicians in general as they are the ones that can cause the most dangerous situations in society with their speech.
- eesmith 7y agoI thought the article was clear that the company was likely worried about backlash for doing so: > Banning politicians wouldn’t be accepted by society as a trade-off for flagging all of the white supremacist propaganda, ... > But external experts Motherboard spoke to said that the measures taken against ISIS were so extreme that, if applied to white supremacy, there would certainly be backlash, because algorithms would obviously flag content that has been tweeted by prominent Republicans—or, at the very least, their supporters. However, it didn't say what that backlash might be, other than referencing a comment by DJT: “No wonder Congress wants to get involved—and they should.”