3 ms·
statistics
by buboard 7y ago
statistics
- qzx_pierri 7y ago[citation needed]
- acdha 7y agoIt’s a scientific study so the citation is literally present in the story if you want to learn what they did: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aat7693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aat7693
- superpermutat0r 7y agoCurse of dimensionality and statistical significance are terms I used in my comment. I'm quite aware of the statistical methods and am a bit confused about how they avoid the dimensionality problem. I'm pretty sure I could get statistical significance for any trait with a highly dimensional dataset.
- dooglius 7y agoRather than making armchair dismissals, consider looking at the paper and its citations which discuss the statistical methods used. From a cursory glance, it looks like they use a standard model of how genes affect traits, which uses O(N) parameters for N genes, so the "curse of dimensionality" would not apply.
- superpermutat0r 7y agoWhen there's thousands of genes then it applies.