4 ms·
Yeah basically. As a ex Clojure user, I’d agree. It’s not shallow and if one finds it shallow then one can write their own macro to be less shallow.
by usgroup 7y ago
Yeah basically. As a ex Clojure user, I’d agree. It’s not shallow and if one finds it shallow then one can write their own macro to be less shallow.
- lioeters 7y agoAs I'm educating myself on Lispy languages, may I ask why the "ex" for Clojure and what (if any) other language you've moved onto?
- usgroup 7y agoI've always used many languages, but I tried clojure for data processing stuff. I moved away from it because the number of libraries was tiny; I had to write my own libraries for doing basic SQLy things. Some hard things were easy in Clojure, but too many easy things were hard.
- lioeters 7y agoThanks! That was interesting to hear about your experience with Clojure. I've heard good things about the language, reading here and there about its features and strengths - so I was curious to know if there were any critiques/cons (pun intended :).