3 ms·
> Who cares, really? The percentage of people who purposefully break their browsers isn't worth catering to. Accessibility. Is there really any reason why a qu
by mscarborough 16y ago
> Who cares, really? The percentage of people who purposefully break their browsers isn't worth catering to.
Accessibility. Is there really any reason why a questions/answer site with voting can't provide noscript tags?
Refactoring ours to deal with that, so not trying to throw stones.
EDIT: I understand mythz's comment about being a play project. i'm just responding to the 'why break your browser' sentiment.
- mythz 16y agoIt's an ajax site that uses static html/js for speed, i.e. there are no .aspx .jsp pages to generate dynamic html on the server. If this were a real app there would be.
- tomh- 16y agoWhy would you provide an implementation with noscript tags? only 0.01% of your users will probably be affected. These are the users who never click or view ads anyway, why spent time for them while you could implement more important features?
- DenisM 16y ago>Is there really any reason why a questions/answer site with voting can't provide noscript tags? Because making two versions of the site is twice as much work?