3 ms·
The number's you're quoting are mostly economic fantasy. Under-employment is closer, but still fails to account those that have given up hope entirely or who h
by mjevans 7y ago
The number's you're quoting are mostly economic fantasy.
Under-employment is closer, but still fails to account those that have given up hope entirely or who haven't been employed before (but should be working).
- manfredo 7y agoRight. Now imagine what the underemployment rate was during the recession when the unemployment rate was three times higher. The claim that it's harder to get a job out of university today than it was a decade ago is very dubious.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]