It's sad how many developers use /L?GPLv[23]/ licensing for their software without actually understanding what those licenses are about. Then crying out loud ab

It's sad how many developers use /L?GPLv[23]/ licensing for their software without actually understanding what those licenses are about. Then crying out loud about "FSF destroying communities" and insisting on "oh, just don't tell anyone about GPL incompatibilities here, because distribution is more important." If they consider an ability to ship the software more important than users' freedoms (in GPL sense), they should've been using appropriate license. I'm not saying GPL is a good or bad choice, but talking about being responsible in (licensing) decisions and statements.