3 ms·
The idea of having more purpose at startups sounds nice but really doesn’t add up to me. If you’re talking about the first employee at the company, even the fi
by cactus2093 7y ago
The idea of having more purpose at startups sounds nice but really doesn’t add up to me.
If you’re talking about the first employee at the company, even the first ~5 engineers, then yeah I buy it. The work is very different and there’s a lot of purpose while you are still pre product/market fit.
But the problem is, if the startup is succeeding the work becomes similar to bigger tech companies pretty quickly - the PMs and designers are dictating exactly what to build, and as an engineer you show up and build that. If you were to leave, someone else could probably take over for you pretty easily. Even by like 5 or 10 engineers, the average engineer at a startup is already becoming a cog in the machine. But the startup is still a long way from being able to compete with FAANG on comp.
Is it really worth sacrificing hundreds of thousands of dollars a year just to be a slightly different type of cog?
- mahmoudimus 7y agoThat's not accurate -- at least in startups that are on track to becoming successful. If you join a startup just to become a cog, do not join that startup. It does take about 6-9 months for an engineer to become impactful from a business sense. If you can wait out that time period, you should join and expect to have impact. If your ideas aren't valued and you're not getting the opportunity of ownership, then maybe you should leave to join another startup or go back to FAANG :)