4 ms·
Triggering demand disconnection randomly is saying "we should provide consumers a service including deliberate random blackouts". That's OK in contexts like Net
by pm215 7y ago
Triggering demand disconnection randomly is saying "we should provide consumers a service including deliberate random blackouts". That's OK in contexts like Netflix where the downstream systems are supposed to be able to be resilient to faults and failures are comparatively low-stakes anyway. But almost all grid consumers aren't resilient to power loss (would your house continue to be fully functional without noticeable ill effects if power to it went out? Mine wouldn't...) and even for industrial scale consumers who do have generators the costs of finding out in a deliberate blackout that their generator was faulty could be anything from expensive to life-threatening.
- noir_lord 7y agoOne of the hospitals affected by the blackout describe in this article had it's generators fail to come online cleanly, they had to go manual in ICU.
- walshemj 7y agoWhy are they not on battery at all times in ICU
- phire 7y agoThe question is not: Should we cut power to 5% of customers or not. The question is: Should we cat power to 5% of the customers now, or let the whole electrical grid stall, resulting in zero power for anyone.