4 ms·
And physically[0], Jake Paul is not a child, further debunking the post I was replying to initially. [0]: I'm sure there's a ton of controversy because this is
by reificator 7y ago
And physically[0], Jake Paul is not a child, further debunking the post I was replying to initially.
[0]: I'm sure there's a ton of controversy because this is the internet and that's what you people do for a living, so I'm sure I'll get some posts claiming he's as mature as a 5 year old or whatever. But Google says born in 1997, which I'm sorry to tell you means he's not a child.
- Simon_says 7y agoJake Paul is mature, FOR a 5 year old.