3 ms·
Out of curiosity, is it this page in particular that was hard on the eyes, or dark-theme pages in general? The interesting part is that the body text appears t
by devadvance 7y ago
Out of curiosity, is it this page in particular that was hard on the eyes, or dark-theme pages in general?
The interesting part is that the body text appears to have a 5.71 contrast ratio, which meets the WCAG 2.1 Level AA criterion [1] but not Level AAA. I wonder if folks pursuing dark themes are making sure to give enough consideration to contrast.
Oddly enough, this is actually one of the reasons I prefer Chrome Dev Tools. They've been adding a lot of accessibility-focused features [2][3], and as it relates to my question, it seems much easier get some of these essential details from Chrome Dev Tools than Firefox.
[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#contrast-minimum https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#contrast-minimum
[2] https://developers.google.com/web/tools/chrome-devtools/accessibility/reference https://developers.google.com/web/tools/chrome-devtools/acce...
[3] https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2019/01/devtools#inspect https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2019/01/devtools#i...
- ferzul 7y agoI can't easily read dark theme apps. Basically if I start one, I have to closely study the app till I find its options and choose the light theme. (This was awful when I had to make a new install of the Gimp recently - it used to be much more user friendly. I was about a minute away from searching the internet for how to change the config file manually or - shock - asking a friend.)