3 ms·

A lot of these customers are so abusive that they should be facing civil or even criminal action. These are not customers who annoyingly ask for a discount or

by wisty 7y ago

A lot of these customers are so abusive that they should be facing civil or even criminal action. These are not customers who annoyingly ask for a discount or need a little hand-holding to get through some forms. These are customers who scream abuse, make threats of various kinds, insult people, and are generally just horrible.

badrabbit 7y ago
I don't care. All I am asking for is due process,documentation and govermental review of their practices.
- michaelmrose 7y ago
  Why do you think you deserve your day in court at someone else's business? If you invite someone to your house for a party if they happen to get drunk do you think you need to ought to be required to consult a tribunal of your friends so people can decide if you had a right to kick them out?
  - badrabbit 7y ago
    Because unless a party at someones house,a business provides goods and services to the public and is subject to the public's approval to operate. Forexample, a restaurant needs to meet public health standards but a private party's kitchen doesn't. You can discriminate based on age and race who enters yout private party but you can't refuse business based on that criteria if you offer services to the public. If you think that's crazy then you'd be stoked to hear I think moderation in for profit sites that ban user generated content (twitter,reddit,news comments,youtube,facebook,etc...) Should also be subject to similar requirements. Your ability to profit from doing business with the public is a privilege not a right. Your ability to peacefully assemble in private with no economic profit or with profit between prople you have an exisiting well established relationship with (without a public place of business or advertisent) is private activity and should not be subject to public approval.
- wisty 7y ago
  Yes, and since these customers are hurting business (by causing higher turnover, more stress on employees, etc) they should also sue those customers and push for the police to lay criminal charges if possible.
  - badrabbit 7y ago
    If that truly is the case I have no problem with what you said. So long as transparency and due process are in place

by wisty 7y ago

badrabbit 7y ago

I don't care. All I am asking for is due process,documentation and govermental review of their practices.

michaelmrose 7y ago
Why do you think you deserve your day in court at someone else's business? If you invite someone to your house for a party if they happen to get drunk do you think you need to ought to be required to consult a tribunal of your friends so people can decide if you had a right to kick them out?
- badrabbit 7y ago
  Because unless a party at someones house,a business provides goods and services to the public and is subject to the public's approval to operate. Forexample, a restaurant needs to meet public health standards but a private party's kitchen doesn't. You can discriminate based on age and race who enters yout private party but you can't refuse business based on that criteria if you offer services to the public. If you think that's crazy then you'd be stoked to hear I think moderation in for profit sites that ban user generated content (twitter,reddit,news comments,youtube,facebook,etc...) Should also be subject to similar requirements. Your ability to profit from doing business with the public is a privilege not a right. Your ability to peacefully assemble in private with no economic profit or with profit between prople you have an exisiting well established relationship with (without a public place of business or advertisent) is private activity and should not be subject to public approval.
wisty 7y ago
Yes, and since these customers are hurting business (by causing higher turnover, more stress on employees, etc) they should also sue those customers and push for the police to lay criminal charges if possible.
- badrabbit 7y ago
  If that truly is the case I have no problem with what you said. So long as transparency and due process are in place