7 ms·
With we you mean you? You should read "Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance", it a autobiography of a man who develops a meta-physical system existing of
by wrnr 7y ago
With we you mean you?
You should read "Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance", it a autobiography of a man who develops a meta-physical system existing of the holy trinity of a thing, the representation of a thing and the essence this representation is missing. Don't read it for the theory but the slow decent into madness.
- breck 7y ago> With we you mean you? No I mean "we". This is a huge collaborative effort. We wouldn't be getting anywhere if not for the help of many dozens (more like hundreds, at this point) people helping out. > "Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance" I have that book, I can't remember reading it, however. Thanks for the rec. I'll give it another look. > Don't read it for the theory but the slow decent into madness. The reason why you see my name everywhere and no one else's is merely because of comments like this. I have very thick skin and can take it, but I don't want to subject my friends and collaborators to this kind of gaslighting. We are almost at the point where the evidence is overwhelming that this theory is correct, and we have peer-reviewed papers in the works (with dozens of collaborators with fancy edu positions whose full names will be on the paper), and then it's game over. In the meantime you can either look at the increasing piles of extraordinary evidence (for example, I made a language today called Dumbdown in less than an hour http://treenotation.org/designer/#standard%20dumbdown http://treenotation.org/designer/#standard%20dumbdown that I would not be surprised if a variant evovles to be bigger than markdown) and think about things for yourself, or jump to a (wrong) conclusion simply because this is a low probability/black swan/outlier event. Black swans are rare. But they do happen.