3 ms·
Let me rephrase: What are the best economic uses for highly intelligent, non-technical people, who are very good at sitting down, reading, and synthesizing info
by ebiester 16y ago
Let me rephrase: What are the best economic uses for highly intelligent, non-technical people, who are very good at sitting down, reading, and synthesizing information from a variety of sources? Most of the jobs that would be suggested are ones like law and journalism, both of whom are highly competitive as well. It's estimated that fewer than 400 people make a living off of fiction, and non-fiction in most cases is a field owned by academics.
Further, most auxiliary careers, such as political analysts,
draw from academia.
So, if this is your top talent, you only have a few options, and other than law, academia actually is one of your best chances to use your top talent.
It's a bit like athletics in this society. If you are very strong and very fast, you have a very limited amount of economically viable options for you. The NBA is a long, long shot, but if you are 6'9 and fast, and that is your primary talent, what do you do?
- tome 16y agoIt's estimated that fewer than 400 people make a living off of fiction Wow, can you point me to a reference for this statement? I find it remarkable.
- ebiester 16y agoIt's bandied about in some writing communities, I'm looking for it. I know that it was referenced as a Columbia study in http://www.dansimmons.com/writing_welll/archive/2009_12.html http://www.dansimmons.com/writing_welll/archive/2009_12.html via http://www.asimovs.com/aspnet_forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=3615 http://www.asimovs.com/aspnet_forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=36... though.