2 ms·

I clicked the Github link. There was nothing but an incomprehensible pen on notebook sketch there. My dude, maybe you're on to something clever, maybe you're j

I clicked the Github link. There was nothing but an incomprehensible pen on notebook sketch there. My dude, maybe you're on to something clever, maybe you're just chasing your own tail. But until you write down clearly exactly what it is that you're on about, nobody can tell. And then you're just annoying us. Focus on a single document somewhere that explains enough to make just a few people go "Aha, this can be used for X! I'll contribute!" Now you have three half-baked "papers" on various stuff, a "data science platform" that I can't figure out how works, and lots of vague fluffy ideas.

breck 7y ago
This particular comment (on a post about visualizing structures in 11 dimensions) is very much targeted toward a very particular type of person who works in a research lab in deep learning and is familiar with high dimensional visualizations. If you happen to be in that target audience, you might have a glimmer of an idea of what it is about. But otherwise it probably looks like jibberish, I get it. > Focus on a single document somewhere that explains enough to make just a few people go "Aha, this can be used for X! I'll contribute!" I'm working with well over 50 different people in many countries at this point helping them with their tree languages and projects. So even if the majority of people don't yet understand what the heck this is all about, enough do that we're starting to make faster progress. What you are seeing is a lot of data points. 2 years I made a logical argument, but that didn't go very far. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Get ready for a deluge of extraordinary evidence.