3 ms·
An open-source protocol won't prevent a platform from accepting content only from approved sources and serving it only to approved clients. Facebook could star
by jmull 7y ago
An open-source protocol won't prevent a platform from accepting content only from approved sources and serving it only to approved clients.
Facebook could start using on open protocol today, then block anyone not signed in through facebook and the result is nothing at all would change.
Maybe you're thinking platforms will somehow also be required to accept and share content from anyone? If so, all platforms become like 8chan (or worse). If not, there's someone, somewhere deciding what can and can't be shared on each platform (like there is now).
I think the fundamental confusion here is the idea that some kind of protocols vs. platform dynamic even exists.
Social media platforms are trying to achieve a captivating user experience built off our social nature to monetize our attention. Protocols are used, but they are deeply buried implementation details.
- mbowcutt 7y agoI don't know about that. Authentication mechanisms seem within scope of any protocol, and if an implementation refuses service based on some extra requirement (such as being signed in to Facebook) then that implementation is simply not up to spec. > Facebook could start using an open protocol today Richard Stallman would prefer you to use the term "free protocol", which I think is what we're all trying to say here ;)
- jmull 7y agoAuthentication mechanisms are in scope (obviously). The set of authorized accessors is not, right? I guess people are not accounting for the distinction, but it’s rather critical here.