3 ms·
I'm struggling to see any actual harm from this use of facial recognition if the video is deleted promptly after processing and conversion to an attendance list
by concordDance 7y ago
I'm struggling to see any actual harm from this use of facial recognition if the video is deleted promptly after processing and conversion to an attendance list.
- threeseed 7y agoSure. Because applications are never, ever hacked and we can always trust companies to look after our data.
- mattlutze 7y agoIn order to make a positive ID of a student, you need to have a biometric photo of them, or a set of unique indicators that your recognition system will be able to compare against. This facial fingerprint will need to be pretty strongly unique so as to avoid false positives or false negatives. If that information is stolen, the thief has the fingerprint for your face, which is very difficult for you to change. The level of protection for that stored information then must be very high, because the damage to the individual in case of its loss is very high. The GDPR is in place, in part, to make certain that the justification is sufficient for an organization requiring you to handover such personal and valuable data. "I want to take attendance" is apparently not sufficient. Further if someone wanted to get creepy, we can imagine what could happen should someone place a foreign agent along the video-recognition-attendance workflow, which then told its owner when and where certain students positively were at any time.
- zaroth 7y agoI couldn't find online if Anderstorp High has Student IDs, but assuming that they do, the school already has a photograph of every student.
- mattlutze 7y agoStudent ID photos and biometric photos aren't necessarily the same, and a software system that tracks with certainty where each student is anywhere in the building has implications, as I mentioned just briefly above.