> This raises an interesting question. Such an attacker would need to craft a tweet with the following constraints: > * Plausible so that people do not believe

> This raises an interesting question. Such an attacker would need to craft a tweet with the following constraints: > * Plausible so that people do not believe it is a compromise > * Offensive enough to cause action > * Not in the category that people just roll their eyes and think Trump is being outrageous on the internet again. > This is probably harder than it seems at first glance. Is the third bullet even a thing after the whole Greenland debacle? Before then I had already thought I'd heard it all.