3 ms·
Afaik the ruling also stated that parents abd children dont have a resonable ability to consent towards a school.
by tapland 7y ago
Afaik the ruling also stated that parents abd children dont have a resonable ability to consent towards a school.
- cameronbrown 7y agoThat makes sense. Opt out for even just one individual would be effectively impossible, otherwise how would the system know who's opted out without remembering them in some way.
- tpxl 7y agoA person who has not opted in has opted out. No tracking necessary.
- cameronbrown 7y agoYou really think they're going to design things opt in and not opt out?
- tpxl 7y agoThe question was how do you track whether people have opted in or not, by not having biometrics for people who have opted out. The solution is simple, if you do not recognise the person, they have not opted in. According to the article, the experiment was constructed as opt in and several students have opted in.
- cameronbrown 7y agoThe thing is, aren't all the efficiency gains wasted if even just a couple students opt out? You've still got to take a register, even if shorter. It can't be worth it for a few extra minutes.
- zaroth 7y agoThis was a tech trial where 22 students and their parents (both separately) opted in to take part over 3 weeks. The teacher also opted-in.
- xxs 7y agoIt's covered by recital 43 which deals with public institutions and power imbalance. There is no practical way for a student (or their parents) to say no, given the circumstances.