3 ms·
It's not a finding. They never compare their results to literature benchmarks, just to the networks they've managed to estimate in R. They also say that charita
by thanatropism 7y ago
It's not a finding. They never compare their results to literature benchmarks, just to the networks they've managed to estimate in R. They also say that charitably they've refrained to reporting the "worst results", but fail to present a summary of quality of results found over the many networks they ran.
- rcar 7y agoI agree, though they do make the pretty strong statement of NNAEPR suggests that one may abandon using NNs altogether, and simply use PR instead. in the blog post, which sounds to me like they're going for a finding.