3 ms·
That assumption lacks justification when the scoring does not actually measure analytical thinking. Any statistical evidence for it is suspect as a predictor of
by mannykannot 7y ago
That assumption lacks justification when the scoring does not actually measure analytical thinking. Any statistical evidence for it is suspect as a predictor of future outcomes when a high score can more easily be gamed than 'honestly' achieved.
- JoeAltmaier 7y agoScoring is not the point here; the analytical thinker is gaming the test to pump the score, thus proving they are an analytical thinker. Not a statistical argument; a suggestion that the screen works, when it is abused. Because it is abused. Anyway, yeah, not really a correlation.