> I don't understand why anyone would present the data like this, sure, 'lower is better' makes sense in benchmarks where you're presenting a raw timing or such

> I don't understand why anyone would present the data like this, sure, 'lower is better' makes sense in benchmarks where you're presenting a raw timing or such, but with an arbitary unit like 'score' just invert the data so bigger -> better and let people's human nature take over. Also for bicycle helmets it makes sense, i.e. force to the head -> lower is better.