4 ms·
My point stands: UN human rights inspectors can enter Texas whenever they choose (no formal invite required!), but not Xinjiang. They can interview anyone they
by _iyig 7y ago
My point stands: UN human rights inspectors can enter Texas whenever they choose (no formal invite required!), but not Xinjiang. They can interview anyone they meet on the street in the US, but not in many parts of China.
I'd also argue that the role of the UN Human Rights Council (whose recent illustrious members have included Venezuela, Cuba, the Philippines, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia) is minuscule compared to that of the global press in terms of fomenting any actual change.
- askmike 7y agoYou mean they can't enter the "educational centers" in Xinjiang? Do you think they can easily enter the "detention centers" in Texas? > I'd also argue that the role of the UN Human Rights Council (whose recent illustrious members have included Venezuela, Cuba, the Philippines, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia) is minuscule compared to that of the global press in terms of fomenting any actual change. I mean the US is also a member, torturing people and commiting war crimes around the clock. Not sure you can dismiss the UN Human Rights Council due to the deeds of some members.
- _iyig 7y agoRoughly 1-2 million Uyghur Muslims do not have the luxury of your equivocations, nor your freedom of expression, nor freedom. I encourage you to watch that entire VICE report I linked. For comparison, here’s VICE News plus a bunch of reporters touring the ICE facility in El Paso: https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/xweqgn/we-got-cameras-inside-one-of-the-biggest-ice-detention-centers-this-is-what-we-saw https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/xweqgn/we-got-cameras-ins... I’ve been chastised before for energetic commenting on this particular topic, and we’re hardly discussing HK now, so I’ll give it a rest.