The final paragraph from that example is steaming gibberish that nobody could mistake for English: "Calling has not, and undoubtedly never will be aggravating

The final paragraph from that example is steaming gibberish that nobody could mistake for English: "Calling has not, and undoubtedly never will be aggravating in the way we encounter mortification but delineate the reprimand that should be inclination. Nonetheless, armed with the knowledge that the analysis augurs stealth with propagandists, almost all of the utterances on my authorization journey. Since sanctions are performed at knowledge, a quantity of vocation can be more gaudily inspected. Knowledge will always be a part of society.Vocation is the most presumptuously perilous assassination of mankind." Yet the robo-scoring acclaims it as: * articulates a clear and insightful position on the issue in accordance with the assigned task * develops the position fully with compelling reasons and/or persuasive examples * sustains a well-focused, well-organized analysis, connecting ideas logically * conveys ideas fluently and precisely, using effective vocabulary and sentence variety * demonstrates superior facility with the conventions of standard written English (i.e., grammar, usage, and mechanics) but may have minor errors Any teacher faced with the requirement to use such tools would be better placed instructing their class on civil disobedience.