This problem is a first class demonstration of the difference between "can we?" and "should we?" The fact that it's being implemented in society is insane beca

This problem is a first class demonstration of the difference between "can we?" and "should we?" The fact that it's being implemented in society is insane because anyone who is paying attention to the state of AI today already knows how it will go wrong: without reading the article I already guessed that it systematically discriminated against certain demographics. Which was in fact what the article claimed. It's interesting that it's possible to predict what the scorer would decide, but the moment you actually implement it is when all of the known problems become relevant, and the intellectual wonder must take a backseat to the human problems.