4 ms·
Agreed. I'm all for a wall of shame. In 2002, if you didn't know that double linked lists exist, you deserve to have your name and picture on every billboard in
by alain94040 16y ago
Agreed. I'm all for a wall of shame. In 2002, if you didn't know that double linked lists exist, you deserve to have your name and picture on every billboard in Silicon Valley.
Will a generous sponsor (EFF, FSF), spend the $2,000 to get a banner on highway 101?
- Natsu 16y agoI think they prefer to get reexaminations to get rid of the patent and have a "Patent Busting Project" to that effect. While a wall of shame is an interesting idea, killing the patent outright is likely a more effective use of their funds. Some of the entities in question aren't really known for their shame and only programmers are likely to appreciate the absurdity of patenting a doubly-linked list in this day and age.