3 ms·
I think the argument is that one set of roles is highly skilled and requires a lot of education & investment in money & time to get to a $40-50k "apprenticeship
by s3r3nity 7y ago
I think the argument is that one set of roles is highly skilled and requires a lot of education & investment in money & time to get to a $40-50k "apprenticeship" -- the other set of roles is not.
Getting paid equally for both of those positions, regardless of future expectations, indicates that something might be off.
- dsfyu404ed 7y ago>I think the argument is that one set of roles is highly skilled and requires a lot of education & investment in money & time t Think of it like grad school cranked to 11. More hours, harder entry requirements, bigger stipend, massive payoff at the end.