3 ms·
As I understand it the power is relative to the square of the diameter of the blades, so bigger is (nonlinearly) better. http://drømstørre.dk/wp-content/wind/mi
by michaelhoney 7y ago
As I understand it the power is relative to the square of the diameter of the blades, so bigger is (nonlinearly) better. http://drømstørre.dk/wp-content/wind/miller/windpower%20web/en/tour/wtrb/size.htm http://xn--drmstrre-64ad.dk/wp-content/wind/miller/windpower...
- JohnJamesRambo 7y agoGreat link, thank you.
- perfunctory 7y agoOn their diagram 40m = 500kW, 80m = 2500kW. So the doubling of diameter is five-fold increase in power. That’s even more than squared.